Difference between revisions of "User:Daleharvey"

From Inkscape Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(tutorial documentation: very important! :-))
 
(10 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>OverView</h2>
<h2>Whiteboard</h2>


<p>I had intended on a working prototype at this point of the program, however an unexpected delay came up with a bug in server implementations which needs to be resolved, I am about to go on a holiday until the 27th and will not be able to undertake any more development until this time</p>


<p>Throughout the time of summer of code I had expected to complete a release worthy implementation of the whiteboard extension, however as I am yet to recieve the first payment from the program. I had to spend a significant time that i had planned on using on the whiteboard project in finding a job and working to get the money I had budgeted to recieve from google, which has seriously affected my timeline.</p>


<h2>Notes</h2>
<p>Following is a Todo list of the tasks I have yet to do, and a timescale in which i plan to implement them</p>


<h2>Project Log</h2>
<h3>TODO</h3>
<em>5/07/06</em>
<ol>
<p>graduation next week is interfering with the progression of the project, but i have managed to develop a system for reducing the undo history stack, and have decided on session establishment protocol,. I just really need to sort out the service discovery which needs input from other, finalised the protocol document up until that point</p>
<li>Finalise manually serialising incoming message - 2 days, 30th August</li>
<em>2/07/06</em>
<li>Apply incoming changes to the whiteboard - 5 days, 4th September</li>
<p>Still cant decide on a protocol for MUC session establishment, I think this will need to be voted, it has quite large effects on implementation. there has been talk about limiting the undo queue needed which is rather a large implementation detail. I am late with the first deliverable, but I think it was expected with how late I was starting the project, It has also been slowed down trying to get multiple parties to agree, It will certainly be ready in time along with the XML schema</p>
<li>Finalise and implement MUC session establishment - 6 days, 9th September</li>
<em>1/07/06</em>
<li>implement conflict resolution - 5 days,14 September</li>
<p>Discussed some of the last issues with the JEP, MUC session establishment, I think we need to have another conference. Issue include service discovery, the sandbox and actual transfer of in band images</p>
<li>I will give 2 weeks afterwards dedicated to making sure the whiteboard is release worthy</li>
<em>30/06/06</em>
<li>Easy to follow step-by-step whiteboard tutorial documentation, specially how to use it on a GoogleTalk account (GoogleTalk is Jabber).</li>
<p>I actually wont need to patch ejabberd, somone has sent the patch, hopefully it will be introduced into latest stable, darcs is being incredibly annoying to install</p>
</ol>
<em>29/06/06</em>
 
<p>Joonas and I have agreed on most protocol issues and decided to work on the same JEP. Some of the tradeoffs, I have agreed that &lt;new&gt; elements should be sent as raw svg, which means I have to compile change events to new svg elements. The other major one being that we will not use the id attribute to track elements, instead a whiteboard specific id given during the creation of an object</p>
<p>Given this timescale I fully expect to have a release worthy implementation for October</p>
<em>28/06/06</em>
 
<p>the first draft of the protocol used a revised version of the old inkboard session negotiation protocol, I think CAP / disco are more suitable for the initial stages of session establishment, so I am researching this to hopefully commit to a revised protocol soon<br />
<h4>Progress</h4>
I also followed up the issue of presence stanzas being incorrectly ordered on ejabberd servers, it look like I would have to submit my own patch to resolve this</p>
<ol>
<em>27/06/06</em>
<li>Serialising Incoming messages - done, jabber.org ensures the in-order processing</li>
<p>Dicussed with joonas about the integration of the jabber.org and my protocol, so far there are only 2 issues, address of elements, which I need to discuss with david yip, and the sending of native svg through the protocol. which is hopefully easy to resolve</p>
 
<em>26/06/06</em>
<li>Apply Incoming Changes - 80% complete, need to handle special case nodes such as defs, and transformation matrices, plus ordering of objects</li>
<p>Started my draft of the whiteboard protocol, for now I will keep an updated copy at http://debrowse.com/protocol.html<br />
 
Jabber.org hosted a discussion on whiteboarding issues, it went quite well, as both peer to peer and muc with client side synchronisation are looking to be supported, with an option for muc with a server component</p>
<li>Conflict resolution - 90% complete, need to finalise rollbacks</li>
<em>25/06/06</em>
</ol>
<p>Have had a few problems integrating a jabber_whiteboard board specific gui to the pedro client, im going to put any development work on hold until I can get the protocol drafted</p>
 
<em>24/06/06</em>
<h3>Done</h3>
<p>Managed to fix the windows build, it ignored makefiles_insert
<ul>
and compiled old code, there are issues with compilation against older
<li>State and Session Handling<li>
versions of gtk.</p>
<li>Peer to peer session establishment</li>
<em>23/06/06</em>
<li>Whiteboard clients broadcast all changes to the document</li>
<p>I spent today merging the INKBOARD_PEDRO branch with the trunk, all works well on linux, I have disabled inkboard to be built on windows for the time being as there is some rather confusing compile errors, which I will hopefully fix tomorrow</p>
<li>Developed a formal protocol in liason with joonas of the psi project location : http://debrowse.com/whiteboard/wb.xml</li>
<em>22/06/06</em>
</ul>
<p>After discussion with David Yip and Joonas of the jabber.org SoC project, A proposal has been set for conflict resolution, I have started extending the protocol document that can be found in the pedro branch. We are setting up a time convenient for a whiteboard related conference in the next week or so</p>
 
<em>21/06/06</em>
<p>Sorry to all who expected the whiteboard to be working at a time before this, for the reasons given above I have been unable to stick the the original schedule. However I fully plan on sticking to the timescale given and finishing the whiteboard. And of course after the whiteboard is complete I fully intend to carry on working on its, or other aspects of inkscapes future development</p>
<p>I have finished uni and can start working full time on the protocol / lib
conversion. We have decided to integrate the whiteboard gui into the pedro
gui. I am starting my work with adding the whiteboard gui into pedro, and
defining groupchat and peer to peer initialisation protocol</p>

Latest revision as of 12:49, 12 June 2008

Whiteboard

I had intended on a working prototype at this point of the program, however an unexpected delay came up with a bug in server implementations which needs to be resolved, I am about to go on a holiday until the 27th and will not be able to undertake any more development until this time

Throughout the time of summer of code I had expected to complete a release worthy implementation of the whiteboard extension, however as I am yet to recieve the first payment from the program. I had to spend a significant time that i had planned on using on the whiteboard project in finding a job and working to get the money I had budgeted to recieve from google, which has seriously affected my timeline.

Following is a Todo list of the tasks I have yet to do, and a timescale in which i plan to implement them

TODO

  1. Finalise manually serialising incoming message - 2 days, 30th August
  2. Apply incoming changes to the whiteboard - 5 days, 4th September
  3. Finalise and implement MUC session establishment - 6 days, 9th September
  4. implement conflict resolution - 5 days,14 September
  5. I will give 2 weeks afterwards dedicated to making sure the whiteboard is release worthy
  6. Easy to follow step-by-step whiteboard tutorial documentation, specially how to use it on a GoogleTalk account (GoogleTalk is Jabber).

Given this timescale I fully expect to have a release worthy implementation for October

Progress

  1. Serialising Incoming messages - done, jabber.org ensures the in-order processing
  2. Apply Incoming Changes - 80% complete, need to handle special case nodes such as defs, and transformation matrices, plus ordering of objects
  3. Conflict resolution - 90% complete, need to finalise rollbacks

Done

  • State and Session Handling
  • Peer to peer session establishment
  • Whiteboard clients broadcast all changes to the document
  • Developed a formal protocol in liason with joonas of the psi project location : http://debrowse.com/whiteboard/wb.xml

Sorry to all who expected the whiteboard to be working at a time before this, for the reasons given above I have been unable to stick the the original schedule. However I fully plan on sticking to the timescale given and finishing the whiteboard. And of course after the whiteboard is complete I fully intend to carry on working on its, or other aspects of inkscapes future development

Retrieved from "https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Daleharvey&oldid=30514"