Difference between revisions of "Stroke Dialog"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Romain2Boss (talk | contribs) m (Code cleanup and add Dialogs Category) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
The Inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a '''Palette''' and it is intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact. | |||
The | |||
intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact. | The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen. | ||
The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the | |||
GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. | |||
valid approach and for GIMP users. | |||
important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen. | |||
It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog? | It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog? | ||
[[Category:Dialogs]] | |||
Revision as of 14:30, 26 December 2012
| GIMP | Inkscape | Scribus |
| upload:stroke_gimp.png |  |
upload:stroke_scribus.png |
The Inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a Palette and it is intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact.
The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen.
It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog?