Difference between revisions of "SpecInformativeUI"

From Inkscape Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
== Release Note ==
== Release Note ==
== Rationale ==
== Rationale ==
'''Advantages:'''
# Basic appearance properties are already there (fill, stroke, stroke width, opacity) and double clicking them opens the Fill&Stroke dialog. Adding ways of accessing filter and LPE editing dialogs seems like a reasonable step to me (because both of them affect the appearance of objects).
# The shortcuts are painted with another color, making detection of an added filter/LPE easier with just a glance at the statusbar.
# Direct access to two of the most used dialogs (IMHO) from the main UI without having to use the menus.
# It doesn't take more space than the current solution so it won't affect negatively narrow screens.
'''Disadvantages:'''
# Might not be doable in GTK+ (unsure).
== Design ==
== Design ==



Revision as of 20:38, 10 January 2011

Launchpad Entry: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/inkscape/+spec/informative-ui

Summary

The UI could benefit from hyperlink-like shortcuts seamlessly placed on the statusbar text. These shortcuts open often used editing dialogs. Other places could get the same treatment.

Release Note

Rationale

Advantages:

  1. Basic appearance properties are already there (fill, stroke, stroke width, opacity) and double clicking them opens the Fill&Stroke dialog. Adding ways of accessing filter and LPE editing dialogs seems like a reasonable step to me (because both of them affect the appearance of objects).
  2. The shortcuts are painted with another color, making detection of an added filter/LPE easier with just a glance at the statusbar.
  3. Direct access to two of the most used dialogs (IMHO) from the main UI without having to use the menus.
  4. It doesn't take more space than the current solution so it won't affect negatively narrow screens.

Disadvantages:

  1. Might not be doable in GTK+ (unsure).

Design

UI

Usage

TODO

Discussion