Difference between revisions of "Stroke Dialog"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Organised into a table for easier comparison) |
(Added Inkscape stroke image) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>upload:stroke_gimp.png</td> | <td>upload:stroke_gimp.png</td> | ||
<td> | <td>[[Image:stroke_inkscape.png]]</td> | ||
<td>upload:stroke_scribus.png</td> | <td>upload:stroke_scribus.png</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<p> | |||
The inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a <b>Palette</b> and it is | |||
intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact. <br> | |||
The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the | |||
GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly | |||
valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so | |||
important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen. | |||
<br> | |||
It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog? | |||
</p> | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 17 July 2007
| GIMP | Inkscape | Scribus |
| upload:stroke_gimp.png |  |
upload:stroke_scribus.png |
The inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a Palette and it is
intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact.
The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the
GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly
valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so
important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen.
It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog?