IconsStyle - Revision history

Colin Marquardt at 15:40, 25 July 2006

2006-07-25T15:40:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 25 July 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[Category:Developer Discussion]]		[[Category:Developer Discussion]]
	[[Category:Needs ~~Discussion~~]]		[[Category:Needs Work]]

Colin Marquardt at 10:15, 21 June 2006

2006-06-21T10:15:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 21 June 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	From this viewpoint, the current node tool secondaries are OK, while for the selector, only the three last buttons (rotate and flip) are OK, others must be made much simpler, flatter and more laconic. The same goes for zoom secondaries which are currently "too beautiful".		From this viewpoint, the current node tool secondaries are OK, while for the selector, only the three last buttons (rotate and flip) are OK, others must be made much simpler, flatter and more laconic. The same goes for zoom secondaries which are currently "too beautiful".

	[[Category:~~Development~~ Discussion]]		[[Category:Developer Discussion]]
	[[Category:Needs Discussion]]		[[Category:Needs Discussion]]

GigaClon: Categorization

2006-06-21T03:37:17Z

Categorization

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 21 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think it makes sense to establish a certain difference in style between the primary (left) and secondary (top) buttons. The primaries may be more 3Dish, with shades and highlights; the secondaries should be much simpler, with less colors, without any highlights or gradients. This contrast need not be too drastic, but may be very helpful.		I think it makes sense to establish a certain difference in style between the primary (left) and secondary (top) buttons. The primaries may be more 3Dish, with shades and highlights; the secondaries should be much simpler, with less colors, without any highlights or gradients. This contrast need not be too drastic, but may be very helpful.

	From this viewpoint, the current node tool secondaries are OK, while for the selector, only the three last buttons (rotate and flip) are OK, others must be made much simpler, flatter and more laconic. The same goes for zoom secondaries which are currently "too ~~beautifil~~".		From this viewpoint, the current node tool secondaries are OK, while for the selector, only the three last buttons (rotate and flip) are OK, others must be made much simpler, flatter and more laconic. The same goes for zoom secondaries which are currently "too beautiful".

			[[Category:Development Discussion]]
			[[Category:Needs Discussion]]

Buliabyak: *

2004-01-08T13:59:12Z

New page

I think it makes sense to establish a certain difference in style between the primary (left) and secondary (top) buttons. The primaries may be more 3Dish, with shades and highlights; the secondaries should be much simpler, with less colors, without any highlights or gradients. This contrast need not be too drastic, but may be very helpful.

From this viewpoint, the current node tool secondaries are OK, while for the selector, only the three last buttons (rotate and flip) are OK, others must be made much simpler, flatter and more laconic. The same goes for zoom secondaries which are currently "too beautifil".