https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Zac 2026-05-23T02:22:43Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.36.1 https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stroke_Dialog&diff=15799 2007-07-17T23:10:00Z

<p>Zac: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;table style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot;&gt;<br /> &lt;tr&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;GIMP&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Inkscape&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Scribus&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;/tr&gt;<br /> &lt;tr&gt;<br /> &lt;td&gt;upload:stroke_gimp.png&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;[[Image:stroke_inkscape.png]]&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td&gt;upload:stroke_scribus.png&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;/tr&gt;<br /> &lt;/table&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;p&gt;<br /> The inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a &lt;b&gt;Palette&lt;/b&gt; and it is<br /> intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact. &lt;br&gt;<br /> The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the<br /> GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly<br /> valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so<br /> important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen.<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog?<br /> &lt;/p&gt;</div>

Zac https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Stroke_inkscape.png&diff=15797 2007-07-17T23:06:07Z

<p>Zac: Stroke Dialog in Inkscape by Zac. Public domain.</p> <hr /> <div>Stroke Dialog in Inkscape by [[User:Zac|Zac]].<br /> <br /> Public domain.</div>

Zac https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stroke_Dialog&diff=15795 2007-07-17T23:03:19Z

<p>Zac: Added Inkscape stroke image</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;table style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot;&gt;<br /> &lt;tr&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;GIMP&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Inkscape&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td style=&quot;text-align: center; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Scribus&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;/tr&gt;<br /> &lt;tr&gt;<br /> &lt;td&gt;upload:stroke_gimp.png&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td&gt;[[Image:stroke_inkscape.png]]&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;td&gt;upload:stroke_scribus.png&lt;/td&gt;<br /> &lt;/tr&gt;<br /> &lt;/table&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;p&gt;<br /> The inkscape stroke dialog is what I prefer to call a &lt;b&gt;Palette&lt;/b&gt; and it is<br /> intened to be always left open and is deliberately compact. &lt;br&gt;<br /> The GIMP uses a transient dialog which is quite different and follows the<br /> GNOME HIG rules for layout of that kind of dialog. This is a perfectly<br /> valid approach and for GIMP users. I dont think the stroke options are so<br /> important that they need a palette always open taking up space onscreen.<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> It begs the question does inkscape need a Palette rather than a standard transient dialog?<br /> &lt;/p&gt;</div>

Zac