<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Judy0000</id>
	<title>Inkscape Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Judy0000"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Judy0000"/>
	<updated>2026-10-31T11:20:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wiki_syntax&amp;diff=48104</id>
		<title>Wiki syntax</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wiki_syntax&amp;diff=48104"/>
		<updated>2009-03-04T05:46:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Judy0000: When Fads Unravel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;When investing, it can be difficult to determine whether the fired-up growth stock you&#039;re eyeing is actually just a fad. People who invested in Crocs at the stock&#039;s crazy highs have learned the perils of such a situation. The shoe company&#039;s fourth-quarter results provide little reason for anybody to believe that Crocs shares can regain their former overpriced glory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crocs did beat analysts&#039; expectations. However, it reported a net loss of $33.2 million, or $0.40 per share, compared to a profit of $38.3 million, or $0.45 per share, during the same period last year. The fourth-quarter net loss included major foreign exchange rate losses; without those, the company still would have reported a net loss of $17.1 million, or $0.20 per share. Revenue plunged 43.9% to $126.1 million.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crocs also forecast a net loss for the first quarter, guiding in the range of $0.32 to $0.17 per share.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company emphasized its improved cash position, accounts receivable, and inventory levels, and these are of course important elements. Cash is king these days, and Crocs&#039; major inventory buildup and mounting accounts receivables hinted at big trouble on the way when the stock first began its downward spiral. However, Crocs&#039; constant emphasis on the poor economy&#039;s negative impact may be a bit misleading. Although I have no doubt that the consumer spending slowdown is taking a bite out of Crocs, it&#039;s also been clear that the fad element of the company&#039;s shoes is rapidly unraveling. That implies that the heady growth of yesteryear is over, even when consumer spending revives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faddish stocks like Crocs and Heelys are dangerous for investors, even if Microsoft  founder Bill Gates apparently believes that Crocs is a good stock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigating the dire economy won&#039;t be easy for discretionary stocks like Crocs. Fellow footwear maker Skechers recently got trampled. On the other hand, these tough times could provide investing opportunities. I&#039;ve wanted to take a deeper look at Deckers lately; its &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.inugg.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ugg boots&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; may be a fad, but they&#039;ve shown remarkable staying power for years now, remaining hot even through last year&#039;s holiday shopping season.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But in Crocs&#039; case, I continue to firmly advise investors to steer clear. Even though it may look cheap trading in penny stock territory, I don&#039;t believe it will ever come near its former growth rates. Buyer, beware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.inugg.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;uggs&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buy &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.inugg.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;buy ugg boots&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; .&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Judy0000</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wiki_syntax&amp;diff=48094</id>
		<title>Wiki syntax</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wiki_syntax&amp;diff=48094"/>
		<updated>2009-03-04T05:45:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Judy0000: When Fads Unravel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;When investing, it can be difficult to determine whether the fired-up growth stock you&#039;re eyeing is actually just a fad. People who invested in Crocs at the stock&#039;s crazy highs have learned the perils of such a situation. The shoe company&#039;s fourth-quarter results provide little reason for anybody to believe that Crocs shares can regain their former overpriced glory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crocs did beat analysts&#039; expectations. However, it reported a net loss of $33.2 million, or $0.40 per share, compared to a profit of $38.3 million, or $0.45 per share, during the same period last year. The fourth-quarter net loss included major foreign exchange rate losses; without those, the company still would have reported a net loss of $17.1 million, or $0.20 per share. Revenue plunged 43.9% to $126.1 million.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crocs also forecast a net loss for the first quarter, guiding in the range of $0.32 to $0.17 per share.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company emphasized its improved cash position, accounts receivable, and inventory levels, and these are of course important elements. Cash is king these days, and Crocs&#039; major inventory buildup and mounting accounts receivables hinted at big trouble on the way when the stock first began its downward spiral. However, Crocs&#039; constant emphasis on the poor economy&#039;s negative impact may be a bit misleading. Although I have no doubt that the consumer spending slowdown is taking a bite out of Crocs, it&#039;s also been clear that the fad element of the company&#039;s shoes is rapidly unraveling. That implies that the heady growth of yesteryear is over, even when consumer spending revives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faddish stocks like Crocs and Heelys are dangerous for investors, even if Microsoft  founder Bill Gates apparently believes that Crocs is a good stock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigating the dire economy won&#039;t be easy for discretionary stocks like Crocs. Fellow footwear maker Skechers recently got trampled. On the other hand, these tough times could provide investing opportunities. I&#039;ve wanted to take a deeper look at Deckers lately; its UGG boots may be a fad, but they&#039;ve shown remarkable staying power for years now, remaining hot even through last year&#039;s holiday shopping season.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But in Crocs&#039; case, I continue to firmly advise investors to steer clear. Even though it may look cheap trading in penny stock territory, I don&#039;t believe it will ever come near its former growth rates. Buyer, beware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love uggs .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buy cheap ugg boots .&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Judy0000</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>